← Dashboard
claude_code

Claude Code (amy.w@naturebaby.com)

claude_code·claude-sonnet-5
Reporting

Not available for this agent

  • Transcripts. Payload capture is off for this organisation. Tokens and costs are still recorded; content is not. Turn it on in Settings if you need transcripts.

Priced by Sentry

$18.36

List-equivalent, not billed

Floor on this volume

$0.9002

All of it on gpt-5.4-nano

Headroom

$17.46

The gap routing could close, at most

Cache hit rate

100%

33.3M tokens read from cache

What this means

This agent moved 34.5M tokens across 1 model, priced at $18.36. The same token volume on gpt-5.4-nano would price at $0.9002. The difference, $17.46, is the most routing could ever recover, not a saving on offer. Whether the cheaper model would have done the job is a judgement telemetry cannot make for you, and any vendor quoting you the full number as a saving is selling you arithmetic.

Note: this agent is on a seat, so none of this is money anyone was billed. The figures are list-equivalent. They still matter, because they tell you what the same work would cost the day you move it onto the API.

Where these levers actually come from

  • Model routing– computed on this page, right now, from this agent's real calls against the price book.
  • Context re-orchestration, tool-call parallelisation, knowledge-base restructuring, conversation-level token tracking– analysis Sentry delivers as onboarding/consulting work today, not a number this console computes on its own. If a proposal names a saving from one of these, it came from a person reading this agent's transcripts, not from this page.

Where the tokens went

claude-sonnet-534.5M · $18.36
share of tokens share of cost

What to do about it

  • One model is doing everything

    Every call on this agent went to claude-sonnet-5. That is simple, and it is also the most expensive way to run an agent. Splitting the easy calls onto a smaller model is where the first real reduction comes from.